Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291271›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024

Citizen scientists filling knowledge gaps of phosphate pollution dynamics in rural areas.

Steven Loiselle, Isabel Bishop, Heather Moorhouse, Caroline Pilat, Eline Koelman, Rosie Nelson, Wim Clymans, John Pratt, Vaughn Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven LoiselleEarthwatch Europe, Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DE, UK. loiselle@unisi.it.
Isabel BishopCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research (CBER) UCL, London, WC1H 0AG, UK.
Heather MoorhouseUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.
Caroline PilatEarthwatch Europe, Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DE, UK.
Eline KoelmanEarthwatch Europe, Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DE, UK.
Rosie NelsonThames Water, Clearwater Court, Vastern Road, Reading, RG1 8DB, UK.
Wim ClymansFlemish Institute for Technological Research, Boeretang 200, 2400, Mol, Belgium.
John PrattColdstone Angling Club, Ascott-Under-Wychwood, OX7 6AF, UK.
Vaughn LewisWindrush AEC Ltd, Fordwells, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ monitoring is fundamental to manage eutrophication in rivers and streams. However, in recent decades, the frequency and spatial coverage of regulatory monitoring have often been reduced due to funding and infrastructure limitations. This reduction has made it impossible to provide adequate coverage for most water bodies. In this study, trained citizen scientists filled spatial and temporal gaps in agency monitoring across a major catchment in rural England. By integrating data from citizen scientists, regulatory agencies, and the local water company, it was possible to demonstrate the opportunities for hypothesis-based citizen scientist monitoring to identify continuous and event-driven sources of phosphate pollution. Local citizen scientists effectively covered important spatial gaps, investigating river conditions both upstream and downstream of suspected pollution point sources, improving the identification of their temporal dynamics. When combined with long-term monitoring data from regulatory agencies, it became possible to identify areas within the catchment that exhibited increased phosphate concentrations during periods of low river discharge (summer). Inter-annual trends and anomaly detection suggested that continuous pollution sources dominated over event-driven sources in many sub-basins, allowing for the prioritisation of mitigation actions. This study highlights the opportunity for citizen scientists to fill gaps in regulatory monitoring efforts and contribute to the improved management of eutrophication in rural catchments.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPhosphatesEnglandRiversWaterPhosphatesWaterCitizen scienceEutrophicationNutrient pollutionStream monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38291271
PMCPMC10827960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.