ReviewNature protocols2024
Quantitative profiling of posttranslational modifications of pathological tau via sarkosyl fractionation and mass spectrometry.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A decision-driven framework for the mass spectrometry analysis of previously uncharacterized protein modifications.STAR protocols · 2026Review
- Biophysical assessment of the molecular mechanisms of Tau aggregation and its role in Alzheimer's disease.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
- Theoretical Investigation of the Material Usage During On-Bead Enrichment of Post-Translationally Modified Peptides in Suspension Systems.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pilot Study for Deciphering Post-Translational Modifications and Proteoforms of Tau Protein by Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tau protein aggregation is associated with posttranslational modifications (PTMs) in 75% of all dementia cases. The distribution of tau pathology and the presence of specific tau phosphorylation sites of interest are typically visualized and measured using antibodies. However, previous knowledge of the target epitopes is required. Additionally, antibodies can be used in a semi-quantitative manner but cannot be used to determine the absolute amount of tau or the extent of the modifications at specific sites or domains. Here we present a discovery assay that characterizes the global qualitative and quantitative tau modification landscape of a sample without a priori knowledge. Our workflow uses sarkosyl fractionation to extract the pathological tau species from sample-limited brain specimens, followed by mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize and quantify tau PTMs. The two-step MS-based proteomics approach includes an exploratory tau PTM analysis and a targeted full-length expressed stable isotope-labeled tau assay, which monitors specific unmodified tau peptides using a heavy isotope-labeled internal standard as a reference. This enables the absolute quantification of the respective tau peptides and the total tau amount in the sample, thus providing the modification extent of tau PTMs. This approach provides precise, comprehensive, qualitative and quantitative tau PTM profiling of the sample. It also enables the detailed molecular comparison of tau across multiple experiments, including a comparison between neurodegenerative diseases, stages of the disease, human patient heterogeneity and characterization of animal models. The approach is useful for studying the molecular features of pathological tau in neurodegeneration. The procedure requires 7-8 d and is suitable for users with expertise in targeted and untargeted MS-based protein analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.