ArticleScientific reports2024
A numerical exploration of the comparative analysis on water and kerosene oil-based Cu-CuO/hybrid nanofluid flows over a convectively heated surface.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerical analysis of magnetized Ag-FeDiscover nano · 2026Article
- Thermal and rheological performance of behran oil-based nanofluids with functionalized BN, CN, and BCN nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fluid flow over an extending sheet has many applications in different fields which include, manufacturing processes, coating, thin film decomposition, heat and mass transfer, biomedical applications, aerospace engineering, environmental science, energy production. Keeping in mind these applications, the non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow comprising of Cu and CuO nanoparticles over an extending sheet is analyzed in this work. Two different base fluids called kerosene oil and water have been incorporated. The sheet is considered to be thermally convective along with zero mass flux condition. The main equations of modeled problem have been transformed to dimensionless form by using similarity variables. The designed problem is evaluated computationally by using bvp4c Matlab function. Validation of the present results is also performed. The impacts of magnetic, Brownian motion, chemical reaction, suction and thermophoresis factors are analyzed and discussed in details. The outcomes of the present investigation declare that the kerosene oil-based hybrid nanofluid flow has greater velocity and concentration profiles than that of the water-based hybrid nanofluid flow. The water-based hybrid nanofluid has greater temperature distribution than that of kerosene oil-based hybrid nanofluid flow. The streamlines of the kerosene oil-based Newtonian and non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flows are more stretched than water-based Newtonian and non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.