ArticleScientific reports2024
A scalable platform for efficient CRISPR-Cas9 chemical-genetic screens of DNA damage-inducing compounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Bayesian-Based Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis Nominates Oncogenic Drivers in Neuroblastoma.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Targeted CRISPR knockout screening identifies known and novel chemogenomic interactions between DNA damaging agents and DNA repair genes.NAR cancer · 2026Article
- Functional Genomics: Principles and Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Next Generation DNA Damage Response Inhibitors: Harnessing Nanocarriers and Tumor Microenvironment for Precision Cancer Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
- A global genetic interaction map of a human cell reveals conserved principles of genetic networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current approaches to define chemical-genetic interactions (CGIs) in human cell lines are resource-intensive. We designed a scalable chemical-genetic screening platform by generating a DNA damage response (DDR)-focused custom sgRNA library targeting 1011 genes with 3033 sgRNAs. We performed five proof-of-principle compound screens and found that the compounds' known modes-of-action (MoA) were enriched among the compounds' CGIs. These scalable screens recapitulated expected CGIs at a comparable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) relative to genome-wide screens. Furthermore, time-resolved CGIs, captured by sequencing screens at various time points, suggested an unexpected, late interstrand-crosslinking (ICL) repair pathway response to camptothecin-induced DNA damage. Our approach can facilitate screening compounds at scale with 20-fold fewer resources than commonly used genome-wide libraries and produce biologically informative CGI profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.