Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291064›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Machine learning to identify chronic cough from administrative claims data.

Vishal Bali, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Jonathan Schelfhout, Misti Paudel, Erin Hulbert, Jesse Peterson-Brandt, Jeffrey Hertzberg, Neal R Kelly, Raja H Patel

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vishal BaliCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. vishal.bali@merck.com.
Vladimir TurzhitskyCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Jonathan SchelfhoutCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Misti PaudelHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR), Optum Insight, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Erin HulbertHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR), Optum Insight, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Jesse Peterson-BrandtHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR), Optum Insight, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Jeffrey HertzbergOptumLabs, Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Neal R KellyOptumLabs, Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Raja H PatelOptumLabs, Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Optum (United States) · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of patient populations is an essential component of clinical research, especially for medical conditions such as chronic cough that are inconsistently defined and diagnosed. We aimed to develop and compare machine learning models to identify chronic cough from medical and pharmacy claims data. In this retrospective observational study, we compared 3 machine learning algorithms based on XG Boost, logistic regression, and neural network approaches using a large claims and electronic health record database. Of the 327,423 patients who met the study criteria, 4,818 had chronic cough based on linked claims-electronic health record data. The XG Boost model showed the best performance, achieving a Receiver-Operator Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.916. We selected a cutoff that favors a high positive predictive value (PPV) to minimize false positives, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value of 18.0%, 99.6%, 38.7%, and 98.8%, respectively on the held-out testing set (n = 82,262). Logistic regression and neural network models achieved slightly lower ROC-AUCs of 0.907 and 0.838, respectively. The XG Boost and logistic regression models maintained their robust performance in subgroups of individuals with higher rates of chronic cough. Machine learning algorithms are one way of identifying conditions that are not coded in medical records, and can help identify individuals with chronic cough from claims data with a high degree of classification value.

Indexed as

Chronic CoughElectronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38291064
PMCPMC10828499
OpenAlexW4391353397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.