Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38291028›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Why flying insects gather at artificial light.

Samuel T Fabian, Yash Sondhi, Pablo E Allen, Jamie C Theobald, Huai-Ti Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mitigating light pollution impacts on arthropods based on light-emitting diode properties.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuromorphic encoding strategies for a noisy magnetic sense.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Harmonic radar suggests greater impact of light pollution for nocturnal insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel T Fabian *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. s.fabian@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-7236
Yash Sondhi *Institute for Environment, Department of Biology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33174, USA. yashsondhi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-3944
Pablo E AllenCouncil on International Educational Exchange, Monteverde Apto, 43-5655, Costa Rica.
Jamie C TheobaldInstitute for Environment, Department of Biology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33174, USA.
Huai-Ti LinDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-244X

Funding

European Research Council 804315National Geographic Society EC-82941R-21National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF IOS-1750833United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AF Office of Scientific Research) AFOSR MURI award FA9550-22-1-0315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explanations of why nocturnal insects fly erratically around fires and lamps have included theories of "lunar navigation" and "escape to the light". However, without three-dimensional flight data to test them rigorously, the cause for this odd behaviour has remained unsolved. We employed high-resolution motion capture in the laboratory and stereo-videography in the field to reconstruct the 3D kinematics of insect flights around artificial lights. Contrary to the expectation of attraction, insects do not steer directly toward the light. Instead, insects turn their dorsum toward the light, generating flight bouts perpendicular to the source. Under natural sky light, tilting the dorsum towards the brightest visual hemisphere helps maintain proper flight attitude and control. Near artificial sources, however, this highly conserved dorsal-light-response can produce continuous steering around the light and trap an insect. Our guidance model demonstrates that this dorsal tilting is sufficient to create the seemingly erratic flight paths of insects near lights and is the most plausible model for why flying insects gather at artificial lights.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalInsectaAnimalsLight

Identifiers

PMID38291028
PMCPMC10827719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.