Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38290840›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Synaptic Origins of the Complex Receptive Field Structure in Primate Smooth Monostratified Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Sara S Patterson, Rebecca J Girresch, Marcus A Mazzaferri, Andrea S Bordt, Wendy L Piñon-Teal, Brett D Jesse, Dinukie-Chantal W Perera, Melanie A Schlepphorst, James A Kuchenbecker, Alice Z Chuang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara S PattersonCenter for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NewYork 14617.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4574-3935
Rebecca J GirreschDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103.
Marcus A MazzaferriDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Andrea S BordtDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Wendy L Piñon-TealDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103.
Brett D JesseDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103.
Dinukie-Chantal W PereraDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103.
Melanie A SchlepphorstDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103.
James A KuchenbeckerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Alice Z ChuangDepartments of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030.
Jay NeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3877-6712
David W MarshakNeurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030.
Judith Mosinger OgilvieDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103 judith.ogilvie@slu.edu david.w.marshak@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-9975
Saint Louis University · ESUniversity of Washington · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · USCenter for Visual Communication (United States) · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Linking retinal circuits to perceptionR01EY027859 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jay Neitz · 2018 to 2026
$4.4M
Reimbursement request for attending the Meeting of the Jointly Sponsored Institutional Predoctoral Training in the Neurosciences T32 Program Directors in Baltimore, MD on 2/19/19T32NS099578 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, JANE M, WONG, RACHEL O · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
Linking rare primate ganglion cells to downstream visual functionsR00EY035323 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Sara S Patterson · 2024 to 2026
$750k
Linking rare primate ganglion cells to downstream visual functionsK99EY035323 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PATTERSON, SARA S · 2023 to 2024
$155k
Foveal ganglion cell function in the living eyeF32EY032318 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PATTERSON, SARA S · 2021 to 2022
$153k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY032318NEI NIH HHS K99 EY035323NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R00 EY035323NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027859NIH HHS P51 OD010425NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in studying the receptive fields of the most common primate retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types, such as parasol RGCs. Much less is known about the rarer primate RGC types and the circuitry that gives rise to noncanonical receptive field structures. The goal of this study was to analyze synaptic inputs to smooth monostratified RGCs to determine the origins of their complex spatial receptive fields, which contain isolated regions of high sensitivity called "hotspots." Interestingly, smooth monostratified RGCs co-stratify with the well-studied parasol RGCs and are thus constrained to receiving input from bipolar and amacrine cells with processes sharing the same layer, raising the question of how their functional differences originate. Through 3D reconstructions of circuitry and synapses onto ON smooth monostratified and ON parasol RGCs from central macaque retina, we identified four distinct sampling strategies employed by smooth and parasol RGCs to extract diverse response properties from co-stratifying bipolar and amacrine cells. The two RGC types differed in the proportion of amacrine cell input, relative contributions of co-stratifying bipolar cell types, amount of synaptic input per bipolar cell, and spatial distribution of bipolar cell synapses. Our results indicate that the smooth RGC's complex receptive field structure arises through spatial asymmetries in excitatory bipolar cell input which formed several discrete clusters comparable with physiologically measured hotspots. Taken together, our results demonstrate how the striking differences between ON parasol and ON smooth monostratified RGCs arise from distinct strategies for sampling a common set of synaptic inputs.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsMacacaSynapsesconnectomicsparallel processingprimateretinal circuitryretinal ganglion cellvision

Identifiers

PMID38290840
PMCPMC11078106
OpenAlexW4391365615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.