Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38290643›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2024

A multidimensional appraisal of early menstrual pain experience.

Frank F Tu, Kevin M Hellman, Sarah E Darnell, Kaela A Harber, Amy M Bohnert, Lavisha Singh, Lynn S Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frank F TuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: ftu@northshore.org.
Kevin M HellmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Sarah E DarnellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Kaela A HarberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Amy M BohnertDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Lavisha SinghDepartment of Biostatistics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Lynn S WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Early Menstrual Pain Impact on Multisensory HypersensitivityR01HD096332 · NICHD · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI TU, FRANK FU-SHENG · 2018 to 2023
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic dysmenorrhea is a global problem, affecting more than 40% of menstruating persons. Cross-sectional studies have implicated psychosocial, biological, and sensory factors in dysmenorrhea but the mechanisms are not fully understood. Only a few prospective longitudinal studies have evaluated such factors in relation to the emergence and course of dysmenorrhea at menarche.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the initial menstruation experience and to evaluate the association of premenarchal psychosocial and sensory factors with the intensity of dysmenorrhea during the period in the fourth month. STUDY

designThis was a prospective cohort study of adolescents who completed premenarchal assessments and postmenarchal daily menstrual diaries for their first (n=149) and fourth month periods (n=114). They were recruited shortly before menarche and completed baseline assessments, including psychosocial questionnaires and experimental pain sensitivity (pressure testing, bladder provocation), and their parents completed related pain questionnaires. The relation between the hypothesized premenarchal factors and month 4 dysmenorrhea intensity was evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests for low (<3 on a 0-10 scale) vs higher (≥3) menstrual pain groups based on maximal pain ratings recorded in a daily diary.

resultsLow levels of dysmenorrhea characterized the first (median, 1; interquartile range, 0-2) and fourth month periods (1; 0-3). Maximal pain ratings increased from the first to the fourth period (3; 1-5 vs 4; 1-6; P=.007). The distribution of dysmenorrhea was multimodal at month 4 with 31.6% of the participants having low levels of maximal pain (1; 0-1) and 68.4% having higher levels (5; 4-6; Hartigan's dip test P<.001). The baseline demographic, psychosocial, and parental pain characteristics were not associated with the development of worse dysmenorrhea. The baseline experimental pain sensitivity, based on pressure pain thresholds, did not differ between the low (15.7 N; 12.5-22.3) and higher (15.0 N; 10.9-21.4]) level dysmenorrhea groups. Baseline bladder pain at first urge also did not differ (low, 6; 0-20 vs higher, 7; 0-19).

conclusionBy their fourth month period, two-thirds of adolescents fell into the higher group for maximal dysmenorrhea, half reported some related impairments in physical activity, and one-seventh reported some related school absence. Premenarchal factors (experimental pain sensitivity, psychosocial profile, parental pain experience) linked to chronic pain emergence in the adult literature did not predict dysmenorrhea intensity, suggesting the dominant factor at menarche may be peripheral afferent activation. Further research is needed to understand the evolution of psychosocial and sensory mechanisms in the development and course of dysmenorrhea.

Indexed as

DysmenorrheaMenarchePain MeasurementAdolescentCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMenstruationPain ThresholdProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentsdysmenorrheamenarchemenstruationobservational studyparental correlatesquantitative sensory testingvisceral pain

Identifiers

PMID38290643
PMCPMC11165568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.