Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38290541›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Quantitative functional imaging of the pigeon brain: implications for the evolution of avian powered flight.

Amy Balanoff, Elizabeth Ferrer, Lemise Saleh, Paul M Gignac, M Eugenia L Gold, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Mark Norell, David Ouellette, Michael Salerno, Akinobu Watanabe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amy BalanoffCenter for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-3818
Elizabeth FerrerDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Lemise SalehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Paul M GignacDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-3258
M Eugenia L GoldDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-3625
Jesús Marugán-LobónUnidad de Paleontología, Departamento Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Cantoblanco (Madrid), Spain.
Mark NorellDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
David OuelletteWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-5456
Michael SalernoPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Akinobu WatanabeDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4772
Shouyi WeiDepartment of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
Gabriel BeverCenter for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-584X
Paul VaskaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

Funding

NSF DDIG 0909970NSF DEB 1801224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of flight is a rare event in vertebrate history, and one that demands functional integration across multiple anatomical/physiological systems. The neuroanatomical basis for such integration and the role that brain evolution assumes in behavioural transformations remain poorly understood. We make progress by (i) generating a positron emission tomography (PET)-based map of brain activity for pigeons during rest and flight, (ii) using these maps in a functional analysis of the brain during flight, and (iii) interpreting these data within a macroevolutionary context shaped by non-avian dinosaurs. Although neural activity is generally conserved from rest to flight, we found significant increases in the cerebellum as a whole and optic flow pathways. Conserved activity suggests processing of self-movement and image stabilization are critical when a bird takes to the air, while increased visual and cerebellar activity reflects the importance of integrating multimodal sensory information for flight-related movements. A derived cerebellar capability likely arose at the base of maniraptoran dinosaurs, where volumetric expansion and possible folding directly preceded paravian flight. These data represent an important step toward establishing how the brain of modern birds supports their unique behavioural repertoire and provide novel insights into the neurobiology of the bird-like dinosaurs that first achieved powered flight.

Indexed as

ColumbidaeDinosaursAnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainFlight, AnimalFossilsPhylogenyavian flightbehavioural evolutionManiraptorapositron emission tomographyTheropoda

Identifiers

PMID38290541
PMCPMC10827418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.