ArticleJournal of animal science2024
Investigating intestinal mast cell dynamics during acute heat stress in growing pigs.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives were to examine the temporal pattern of intestinal mast cell dynamics and the effects of a mast cell stabilizer (ketotifen [Ket]) during acute heat stress (HS) in growing pigs. Crossbred barrows (n = 42; 32.3 ± 1.9 kg body weight [BW]) were randomly assigned to 1 of 7 environmental-therapeutic treatments: (1) thermoneutral (TN) control (TNCon; n = 6), (2) 2 h HS control (2 h HSCon; n = 6), (3) 2 h HS + Ket (2 h HSKet; n = 6); (4) 6 h HSCon (n = 6), (5) 6 h HSKet (n = 6), (6) 12 h HSCon (n = 6), or (7) 12 h HSKet (n = 6). Following 5 d of acclimation to individual pens, pigs were enrolled in two experimental periods (P). During P1 (3 d), pigs were housed in TN conditions (21.5 ± 0.8 °C) for the collection of baseline measurements. During P2, TNCon pigs remained in TN conditions for 12 h, while HS pigs were exposed to constant HS (38.1 ± 0.2 °C) for either 2, 6, or 12 h. Pigs were euthanized at the end of P2, and blood and tissue samples were collected. Regardless of time or therapeutic treatment, pigs exposed to HS had increased rectal temperature, skin temperature, and respiration rate compared to their TNCon counterparts (1.9 °C, 6.9° C, and 119 breaths/min; P < 0.01). As expected, feed intake and BW gain markedly decreased in HS pigs relative to their TNCon counterparts (P < 0.01). Irrespective of therapeutic treatment, circulating corticotropin-releasing factor decreased from 2 to 12 h of HS relative to TNCon pigs (P < 0.01). Blood cortisol increased at 2 h of HS (2-fold; P = 0.04) and returned to baseline by 6 h. Plasma histamine (a proxy of mast cell activation) remained similar across thermal treatments and was not affected by Ket administration (P > 0.54). Independent of Ket or time, HS increased mast cell numbers in the jejunum (94%; P < 0.01); however, no effects of HS on mast cell numbers were detected in the ileum or colon. Jejunum and ileum myeloperoxidase area remained similar among treatments (P > 0.58) but it tended to increase (12%; P = 0.08) in the colon in HSCon relative to TNCon pigs. Circulating lymphocytes and basophils decreased in HSKet relative to TN and HSCon pigs (P ≤ 0.06). Blood monocytes and eosinophils were reduced in HS pigs relative to their TNCon counterparts (P < 0.01). In summary, HS increased jejunum mast cell numbers and altered leukocyte dynamics and proinflammatory biomarkers. However, Ket administration had no effects on mast cell dynamics measured herein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.