Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38290286›Full record

ReviewPsychiatry research2024

Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, large language models are poised for psychological assessment.

Oscar N E Kjell, Katarina Kjell, H Andrew Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychiatry research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oscar N E KjellPsychology Department, Lund University, Sweden; Computer Science Department, Stony Brook University, United States. Electronic address: oscar.kjell@psy.lu.se.
Katarina KjellPsychology Department, Lund University, Sweden.
H Andrew SchwartzPsychology Department, Lund University, Sweden; Computer Science Department, Stony Brook University, United States.

Funding

Large-scale Data Scientific Assessment of Unhealthy Alcohol Consumption Among Front-Line Restaurant WorkersR01AA028032 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SCHWARTZ, HANSEN ANDREW · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
SCH: Advancing Language-based Analyses of Social Media to Reliably Monitor Variation in PopulationR01MH125702 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI EICHSTAEDT, JOHANNES C., SCHWARTZ, HANSEN ANDREW · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA028032NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125702NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH012476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this narrative review, we survey recent empirical evaluations of AI-based language assessments and present a case for the technology of large language models to be poised for changing standardized psychological assessment. Artificial intelligence has been undergoing a purported "paradigm shift" initiated by new machine learning models, large language models (e.g., BERT, LAMMA, and that behind ChatGPT). These models have led to unprecedented accuracy over most computerized language processing tasks, from web searches to automatic machine translation and question answering, while their dialogue-based forms, like ChatGPT have captured the interest of over a million users. The success of the large language model is mostly attributed to its capability to numerically represent words in their context, long a weakness of previous attempts to automate psychological assessment from language. While potential applications for automated therapy are beginning to be studied on the heels of chatGPT's success, here we present evidence that suggests, with thorough validation of targeted deployment scenarios, that AI's newest technology can move mental health assessment away from rating scales and to instead use how people naturally communicate, in language.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguageHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceAssessmentLarge language modelsPsychologyTransformers

Identifiers

PMID38290286
PMCPMC11911012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.