Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38290249›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2024

Clinical utility of Next Generation Sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for the molecular profiling of patients with NSCLC at diagnosis and disease progression.

Marzia Del Re, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Iacopo Petrini, Andrea Sbrana, Vieri Scotti, Diego de Miguel Perez, Lorenzo Livi, Stefania Crucitta, Mauro Iannopollo, Francesca Mazzoni and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Marzia Del ReUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Thoracic Oncology Center, Tisch Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Hospital System & Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Giovanna Irene LuculliUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Iacopo PetriniUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea SbranaUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vieri ScottiRadiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, AOU Careggi Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Diego de Miguel PerezThoracic Oncology Center, Tisch Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Hospital System & Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Stefania CrucittaUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mauro IannopolloOncology Department, Oncology Unit, San Jacopo Hospital, Pistoia, Italy.
Francesca MazzoniMedical Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Martina RuglioniUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Carmelo TibaldiDepartment of Oncology, S. Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy.
Emanuela OlmettoRadiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, AOU Careggi Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Irene StasiDepartment of Oncology, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy.
Editta BaldiniDepartment of Oncology, S. Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy.
Giacomo AllegriniDepartment of Oncology, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoMedical Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Franco MorelliMedical Oncology Unit, Gemelli Hospital Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Andrea PieriniIntegrated Access, Roche, Monza, Italy.
Nicola PanzeriIntegrated Access, Roche, Monza, Italy.
Stefano FogliUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio ChellaUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Christian RolfoThoracic Oncology Center, Tisch Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Hospital System & Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Romano DanesiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milano, Italy. Electronic address: romano.danesi@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study evaluates the utility of NGS analysis of circulating free DNA (cfDNA), which incorporates small amounts of tumor DNA (ctDNA), at diagnosis or at disease progression (PD) in NSCLC patients.

methodsComprehensive genomic profiling on cfDNA by NGS were performed in NSCLC patients at diagnosis (if tissue was unavailable/insufficient) or at PD to investigate potential druggable molecular aberrations. Blood samples were collected as routinary diagnostic procedures, DNA was extracted, and the NextSeq 550 Illumina platform was used to run the Roche Avenio ctDNA Expanded Kit for molecular analyses. Gene variants were classified accordingly to the ESCAT score.

resultsA total of 106 patients were included in this study; 44 % of cases were requested because of tissue unavailability at the diagnosis and 56 % were requested at the PD. At least one driver alteration was observed in 62 % of cases at diagnosis. Driver druggable variants classified as ESCAT level I were detected in 34 % of patients, including ALK-EML4, ROS1-CD74, EGFR, BRAF, KRAS p.G12C, PI3KCA. In the PD group, most patients were EGFR-positive, progressing to a first line-therapy. Sixty-three percent of patients had at least one driver alteration detected in blood and 17 % of patients had a known biological mechanism of resistance allowing further therapeutic decisions.

conclusionsThe present study confirms the potential of liquid biopsy to detect tumour molecular heterogeneity in NSCLC patients at the diagnosis and at PD, demonstrating that a significant number of druggable mutations and mechanisms of resistance can be detected by NGS analysis on ctDNA.

Indexed as

Liquid biopsyNGSNSCLCPredictive biomarkersResistance to treatment

Identifiers

PMID38290249
PMCPMC10859238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.