ArticleBlood2024
Conformational activation and inhibition of von Willebrand factor by targeting its autoinhibitory module.
Article in Blood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining AI Structure Prediction and Integrative Modeling for Nanobody-Antigen Complexes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Flow molecular dynamics simulations reveal mechano-presentation of von Willebrand factor through glycan-modulated autoinhibitory modules.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Structure and multiple functions of von Willebrand factor.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Nanobody activator improves sensitivity of the von Willebrand factor activity assay to multimer size.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byTaking AIM.2024
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractActivation of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a tightly controlled process governed primarily by local elements around its A1 domain. Recent studies suggest that the O-glycosylated sequences flanking the A1 domain constitute a discontinuous and force-sensitive autoinhibitory module (AIM), although its extent and conformation remains controversial. Here, we used a targeted screening strategy to identify 2 groups of nanobodies. One group, represented by clone 6D12, is conformation insensitive and binds the N-terminal AIM (NAIM) sequence that is distal from A1; 6D12 activates human VWF and induces aggregation of platelet-rich plasma at submicromolar concentrations. The other group, represented by clones Nd4 and Nd6, is conformation sensitive and targets the C-terminal AIM (CAIM). Nd4 and Nd6 inhibit ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation and reduce VWF-mediated platelet adhesion under flow. A crystal structure of Nd6 in complex with AIM-A1 shows a novel conformation of both CAIM and NAIM that are primed to interact, providing a model of steric hindrance stabilized by the AIM as the mechanism for regulating GPIbα binding to VWF. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry analysis shows that binding of 6D12 induces the exposure of the GPIbα-binding site in the A1 domain, but binding of inhibitory nanobodies reduces it. Overall, these results suggest that the distal portion of NAIM is involved in specific interactions with CAIM, and binding of nanobodies to the AIM could either disrupt its conformation to activate VWF or stabilize its conformation to upkeep VWF autoinhibition. These reported nanobodies could facilitate future studies of VWF functions and related pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.