Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38289997›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Mechanistic Modeling of Intrathecal Chemotherapy Pharmacokinetics in the Human Central Nervous System.

Jing Li, Andrew Wu, Seongho Kim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LiKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-1386
Andrew WuNorthville High School, Northville, Michigan.ORCID 0009-0005-0698-616X
Seongho KimKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-073X
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USGentherm (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Drug Penetration into the Human Brain and Brain TumorsR01CA255124 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JING, SANAI, NADER · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe pharmacokinetics of intrathecally administered antibody or small-molecule drugs in the human central nervous system (CNS) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to provide mechanistic and quantitative perspectives on the CNS pharmacokinetics of intrathecal chemotherapy, by using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. EXPERIMENTAL

designA novel CNS PBPK model platform was developed and verified, which accounted for the human CNS general anatomy and physiologic processes governing drug distribution and disposition. The model was used to predict CNS pharmacokinetics of antibody (trastuzumab) and small-molecule drugs (methotrexate, abemaciclib, tucatinib) following intraventricular injection or intraventricular 24-hour infusion, and to assess the key determinants of drug penetration into the deep brain parenchyma.

resultsIntraventricularly administered antibody and small-molecule drugs exhibited distinct temporal and spatial distribution and disposition in human CNS. Both antibody and small-molecule drugs achieved supratherapeutic or therapeutic concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments and adjacent brain tissue. While intrathecal small-molecule drugs penetrated the deep brain parenchyma to a negligible extent, intrathecal antibodies may achieve therapeutic concentrations in the deep brain parenchyma. Intraventricular 24-hour infusion enabled prolonged CNS exposure to therapeutically relevant concentrations while avoiding excessively high and potentially neurotoxic drug concentrations.

conclusionsCNS PBPK modeling, in line with available clinical efficacy data, confirms the therapeutic value of intrathecal chemotherapy with antibody or small-molecule drugs for treating neoplastic meningitis and warrants further clinical investigation of intrathecal antibody drugs to treat brain parenchyma tumors. Compared with intraventricular injection, intraventricular 24-hour infusion may mitigate neurotoxicity while retaining potential efficacy.

Indexed as

BrainCentral Nervous SystemHumansMethotrexateMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID38289997
PMCPMC10984761
OpenAlexW4391340729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.