Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38289940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effects of Bacillus subtilis as a single strain probiotic on growth, disease resistance and immune response of striped catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus).

Razia Liaqat, Shafaq Fatima, Wajeeha Komal, Qandeel Minahal, Zakia Kanwal, Muhammad Suleman, Chris G Carter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Dose-dependent effect of Bacillus subtilis on aquaculture pond ecosystems.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Review
  6. Integrated Probiotic Benefits ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Co-Encapsulated ProbioticInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Razia LiaqatDepartment of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Shafaq FatimaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7133-3633
Wajeeha KomalDepartment of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Qandeel MinahalDepartment of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Zakia KanwalDepartment of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad SulemanInstitute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8076-2440
Chris G CarterAquaculture Nutrition at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Lahore College for Women University · PKPurdue University Fort Wayne · USUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the potential role of Bacillus subtilis as probiotic in striped catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus). Fish (initial weight = 150.00±2.63g n = 180) were stocked in circular tanks. Four isonitrogenous (30%) and isolipidic (3.29%) diets were formulated having supplementation of B. subtilis at four different levels (P0; 0, P1: 1×106, P2: 1×108 and P3: 1×1010 CFU/g). Each treatment had three replicates, while each replicate had fifteen fish. The trial started on second week of July and continued for eight weeks. Growth, feed conversion ratio, crude protein content, the concentration of amylase and protease, the profile of both dispensable and non-dispensable amino acids in all four dietary groups increased with a gradual increase of B. subtilis in the diet. At the end of growth experiment, fish in all four groups were exposed to Staphylococcus aureus (5×105 CFU/ml). After S. aureus challenge, fish fed with B. subtilis responded better to damage caused by reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation and better survival rate. The catalase and superoxide dismutase level also increased in response to bacterial challenge in B. subtilis fed groups. On the other hand, the concentration of malondialdehyde gradually decreased in these groups (+ve P0 >P1>P2>P3). It is concluded that supplementation of B. subtilis as a probiotic improved the growth, protein content, antioxidant response and immunocompetency against S. aureus in striped catfish. The optimum dosage of B. subtilis, at a concentration of 1×1010 CFU/g, resulted in the most favorable outcomes in striped catfish. This single bacterial strain can be used as an effective probiotic in large scale production of aquafeed for striped catfish. Future studies can investigate this probiotic's impact in the intensive culture of the same species.

Indexed as

CatfishesProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBacillus subtilisDietDietary SupplementsDisease ResistanceStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID38289940
PMCPMC10842300
OpenAlexW4391345835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.