ArticlePloS one2024
Nurse-led self-care interventions for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nursing interventions for people with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Nurse-Led Interventions to Improve Health, Adherence, and Functional Outcomes in Adults and Older Adults With Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Quasiexperimental Studies.Journal of nursing management · 2025Pooled it
- Regional differences in health status and its associations with health behaviors and healthcare utilization among older adults in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study using the 2019~2020 Korean Community Health Survey.Journal of Korean gerontological nursing · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study on Self-Perceived Burden in Elderly Patients with Diabetes and Frailty Based on Social Ecological Theory.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- The effect of psychosocial interventions by nurses on the well-being of aged Indian adults.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of self-care interventions is progressively recognized, marked by a rapidly aging population that results in growing demands on costly tertiary and institutional care services, placing substantial pressure on health and social care systems. Against this background, in this study, we will provide evidence for the impact of self-care interventions on health-related quality of life by focusing on interventions led by nurses who can employ integrated approaches. Several databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and PubMed, will be searched along with gray literature to prevent biased results. There will be no time restrictions, and all literature with English abstracts will be included. Using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication framework, we will evaluate intervention characteristics. The primary outcome will be health-related quality of life, and the secondary outcomes will be symptom burden, physical function, and cost-effectiveness. Pairwise and network meta-analyses will be performed, and network geometry and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to determine which type of nurse-led self-care intervention is best for health-related quality of life for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. We will secure study quality through PRISMA, AMSTAR 2, RoB 2.0, and the GRADE checklist. To ensure the quality of network meta-analysis, similarity will be checked based on the PICO framework. The consistency of the network meta-analysis results will be checked to ensure transitivity by using the Bayesian hierarchical framework. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022365467).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.