ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2023
Tracheostomy among Children Admitted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Centre.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological Characteristics, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Tracheotomy in Serbia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Liberation of mechanical ventilation in tracheostomized pediatric patients during their stay in the intensive care unit]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy is commonly performed for upper airway obstruction, prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheo-bronchial toileting. Pediatric tracheostomy differs from adult tracheostomy in terms of surgical procedure, post-operative care and recovery. The tracheostomized patients may either be decannulated, discharged with tube-in-situ or the patient may expire. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of tracheostomy in patients admitted to the Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed among children admitted to the Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre from 1 May 2017 to 31 August 2022 after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. A convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at 95% Confidence Interval. Results: Among 1472 patients, tracheostomy was done in 65 (4.41%) (3.37-5.47, 95% Confidence Interval). A total of 33 (50.76%) underwent tracheostomy for prolonged ventilation whereas 32 (49.23%) were tracheostomized for airway obstruction. Among them, 41 (63.07%) patients were successfully decannulated, 9 (13.84%) were discharged with tracheostomy tubes in situ whereas 15 (23.07%) patients deceased. The most common complication was tracheostomy tube blockage reported in 5 (7.69%). Conclusions: The prevalence of tracheostomy among the children of the pediatric intensive care unit was found to be lower than in other studies. Keywords: mechanical ventilation; complication; pediatric; tracheostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.