Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38289557›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Sustainable binary/ternary blended mortars with recycled water treatment sludge using fly ash or blast slag: Characterization and environmental-economical impacts.

Ceren Kina

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ceren KinaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Türkiye. ceren.kina@ozal.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-3323
Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

Malatya Turgut Ozal University 23G08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water treatment sludge (WTS) is produced daily and disposed of as hazardous material. It would be advisable to use locally available waste products as supplementary cementitious materials that ensure to be disposed of without harming the environment. As a novelty, this research investigated the potential of using recycled WTS with fly ash (FA) and ground-granulated blast furnace slag (BFS) as ternary blended binders. Thus, it can provide an economical solution and alleviate the adverse environmental effects of excessive production of wastes and cement production. Within this scope, the mortars with 0-30 wt% replacement of cement with modified WTS (MWTS) were produced as binary blend, and also, they were combined with FA/BFS as ternary blended binders. Therefore, optimum utilization of waste products into the mortar in terms of rheological, mechanical, durability, microstructural properties, and environmental-economical aspects was examined. Adding 10% recycled WTS as binary caused higher strengths with lower porosity measured by the mercury intrusion porosimeter test and denser microstructure, as revealed by XRD patterns and SEM results. However, the drawbacks of using recycled WTS, in terms of rheological parameters and environmental-economical aspects, were suppressed by adding FA/BFS with comparable strength values. Specifically, cost, CO

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsSewageClimateCoal AshHazardous SubstancesHumansWaste ProductsCoal AshHazardous SubstancesSewageWaste ProductsEnvironmental impact and costFly ashGround-granulated blast furnace slagRheology and strengthWater treatment sludge

Identifiers

PMID38289557
PMCPMC10884113
OpenAlexW4391350754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.