ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Reduced eye gaze fixation during emotion recognition among patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Schizophrenia recognition via eye movement features in video paradigm.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Assessing Executive Function in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Through a Game-Based Assessment Task.Behavioural neurology · 2026Article
- More Fixations in Static Facial Regions During Emotion Recognition Among TLE Patients With Severe Depression.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the facial scan patterns during emotion recognition (ER) through the dynamic facial expression task and the awareness of social interference test (TASIT) using eye tracking (ET) technology, and to find some ET indicators that can accurately depict the ER process, which is a beneficial supplement to existing ER assessment tools.
methodNinety-six patients with TLE and 88 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. All participants watched the dynamic facial expression task and TASIT including a synchronized eye movement recording and recognized the emotion (anger, disgust, happiness, or sadness). The accuracy of ER was recorded. The first fixation time, first fixation duration, dwell time, and fixation count were selected and analyzed.
resultsTLE patients exhibited ER impairment especially for disgust (Z = - 3.391; p = 0.001) and sadness (Z = - 3.145; p = 0.002). TLE patients fixated less on the face, as evidenced by the reduced fixation count (Z = - 2.549; p = 0.011) of the face and a significant decrease in the fixation count rate (Z = - 1.993; p = 0.046). During the dynamic facial expression task, TLE patients focused less on the eyes, as evidenced by the decreased first fixation duration (Z = - 4.322; p = 0.000), dwell time (Z = - 4.083; p = 0.000), and fixation count (Z = - 3.699; p = 0.000) of the eyes.
conclusionTLE patients had ER impairment, especially regarding negative emotions, which may be attributable to their reduced fixation on the eyes during ER, and the increased fixation on the mouth could be a compensatory effect to improve ER performance. Eye-tracking technology could provide the process indicators of ER, and is a valuable supplement to traditional ER assessment tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38289536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.