Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38289530›Full record

ReviewCurrent medical science2024

Nutritional Assessment Tools for Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Peng-Peng Wang, Kim Lam Soh, Huzwah Binti Khazaai, Chuan-Yi Ning, Xue-Ling Huang, Jia-Xiang Yu, Jin-Lian Liao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng-Peng WangFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia. 445946371@qq.com.
Kim Lam SohFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia. sklam@upm.edu.my.
Huzwah Binti KhazaaiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.
Chuan-Yi NingNursing College of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Xue-Ling HuangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jia-Xiang YuFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.
Jin-Lian LiaoDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer patients are at high risk of malnutrition, which can lead to adverse health outcomes such as prolonged hospitalization, increased complications, and increased mortality. Accurate and timely nutritional assessment plays a critical role in effectively managing malnutrition in these patients. However, while many tools exist to assess malnutrition, there is no universally accepted standard. Although different tools have their own strengths and limitations, there is a lack of narrative reviews on nutritional assessment tools for cancer patients. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a non-systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until May 2023. A total of 90 studies met our selection criteria and were included in our narrative review. We evaluated the applications, strengths, and limitations of 4 commonly used nutritional assessment tools for cancer patients: the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). Our findings revealed that malnutrition was associated with adverse health outcomes. Each of these 4 tools has its applications, strengths, and limitations. Our findings provide medical staff with a foundation for choosing the optimal tool to rapidly and accurately assess malnutrition in cancer patients. It is essential for medical staff to be familiar with these common tools to ensure effective nutritional management of cancer patients.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNeoplasmsNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentHumanscancermalnutritionnutritionnutritional assessmenttool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.