Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288778›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2024

Ethical issues in pain and palliation.

Marco Cascella, Alessandro Laudani, Giuliana Scarpati, Ornella Piazza

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CascellaDipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia, Odontoiatria 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', Università di Salerno.
Alessandro LaudaniAOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italia.
Giuliana ScarpatiDipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia, Odontoiatria 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', Università di Salerno.
Ornella PiazzaDipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia, Odontoiatria 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', Università di Salerno.
Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIncreased public awareness of ethical issues in pain and palliative care, along with patient advocacy groups, put pressure on healthcare systems and professionals to address these concerns.Our aim is to review the ethics dilemmas concerning palliative care in ICU, artificial intelligence applications in pain therapy and palliative care, and the opioids epidemics. RECENT

findingsIn this focus review, we highlighted state of the art papers that were published in the last 18 months, on ethical issues in palliative care within the ICU, artificial intelligence trajectories, and how opioids epidemics has impacted pain management practices (see Visual Abstract). SUMMARY: Palliative care in the ICU should involve a multidisciplinary team, to mitigate patients suffering and futility. Providing spiritual support in the ICU is an important aspect of holistic patient care too.Increasingly sophisticated tools for diagnosing and treating pain, as those involving artificial intelligence, might favour disparities in access, cause informed consent problems, and surely, they need prudence and reproducibility.Pain clinicians worldwide continue to face the ethical dilemma of prescribing opioids for patients with chronic noncancer pain. Balancing the need for effective pain relief with the risk of opioid misuse, addiction, and overdose is a very controversial task.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainArtificial IntelligenceHumansPalliative CareReproducibility of ResultsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID38288778
PMCPMC10911254
OpenAlexW4391360593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.