ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2024
A hospital-wide group approach to promote open dialogues of workplace issues and staff wellbeing with Schwartz Rounds.
Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to explore the feasibility and impact of Schwartz Rounds® led by psychiatrists/mental health professionals in an urban Australian public hospital setting and to develop strategies for optimising participants' experiences.
methodsBeing a mixed-methods study collecting qualitative and quantitative data through post-Rounds evaluation surveys, this study thematically analysed responses from 105 participants attending four consecutive monthly Rounds between February and May 2023 to assess the perceived benefits and challenges of Schwartz Rounds.
resultsRespondents highly valued the Rounds and felt cared for by the healthcare organisation. Themes related to perceived benefits included (i) Connectedness and shared experience; (ii) Understanding other professionals; (iii) Normalisation of emotional distress, validation and a safe space for vulnerability; and (iv) Fostering authenticity and humanitarian aspects of healthcare. Challenges included (i) Fear of exposure and judgment; (ii) Emotional discomfort; (iii) Unfamiliarity with reflection; and (iv) Safety concerns.
conclusionsThis study suggests acceptability and feasibility of implementing Schwartz Rounds within an Australian public health setting, particularly when facilitated by skilled mental health professionals. The outcomes provide preliminary support for the use of group interventions to enhance staff collegiality and culture in healthcare settings, thereby addressing critical needs for health professional wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.