ArticleCase reports in oncology
A Dramatic Response to Second-Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in BRAF-V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current treatment options for BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma include anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3 agents, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and clinical trials. The strategy of combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has shown promising results, achieving higher response rates, longer duration of response, improved progression-free survival, and enhanced overall survival. The optimal sequence of treatments remains a topic of interest, with preliminary data suggesting a greater effectiveness of immunotherapy as the first-line approach. Preclinical trials have indicated that the efficacy of this sequence may be due to the modification of the immune environment by BRAF kinase inhibitors, leading to immune escape by tumor cells and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 72-year-old woman with high-burden metastatic melanoma who failed to respond to prior targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and exhibited a successful response to the second-line treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. We discuss the potential reasons for this positive outcome contributing to the current debate concerning treatment sequences, resistance mechanisms, and biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma. Conclusion: We believe that in few years the therapeutic algorithms in BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma will be more complex since they will define clearly the correct therapeutic sequences with the inclusion of new immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs and multiple predictive biomarkers of response to better select patients eligible to immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.