Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288450›Full record

ReviewRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)

[Comparison of the outcome of orthodontic dental movement using aligners versus fixed orthodontics: a review].

Mónica Ivette Malpartida-Pacheco, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PerceptionRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mónica Ivette Malpartida-PachecoDivisión de Ortodoncia, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú. 100069885@cientifica.edu.pe Universidad Científica del Sur División de Ortodoncia Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru 100069885@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-2165
Julissa Amparo Dulanto-VargasResearch Group in Dental Sciences, Carrera de Estomatología, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú. jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe Universidad Científica del Sur Carrera de Estomatología Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-3853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aligners have become a preferred alternative in terms of orthodontic treatment, surpassing the choice of conventional brackets, due to the comfort and aesthetics that the aligners represent, however, the final result with this system continues to be a controversial issue. The objective of this review was to verify the effectiveness of the treatment completed with aligners versus conventional brackets. Materials and methods: An exhaustive search was carried out in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Embase databases up to the date of January 5, 2023, including comparative studies that evaluated the final result and treatment time of the aligners compared to conventional braces. Two researchers carefully selected the articles evaluated and analyzed different key topics on the subject. Results: In this study, 8 articles were included, according to the studies, the vast majority did not find significant differences in completion between the compared groups. In addition to this, the treatment time in 3 articles was faster with aligners, in 3 articles it was faster with conventional brackets, and in one article no significant difference was found, so it is not yet established whether a system is faster than the other. Conclusions: Both aligners and conventional fixed orthodontics had good results at the end of orthodontic treatment and presented a similar treatment time, however, the majority of treated cases belonged to malocclusions of medium to low complexity, so these cannot be generalized. findings to all malocclusions.

Indexed as

alignersconventional bracketsfixed orthodonticorthodontic movements

Identifiers

PMID38288450
PMCPMC10809973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.