ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Topological data analysis expands the genotype to phenotype map for 3D maize root system architecture.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating 3D phenotyping and functional-structural plant models for crop ideotype breeding.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Phenome-to-genome insights for evaluating root system architecture in field studies of maize.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central goal of biology is to understand how genetic variation produces phenotypic variation, which has been described as a genotype to phenotype (G to P) map. The plant form is continuously shaped by intrinsic developmental and extrinsic environmental inputs, and therefore plant phenomes are highly multivariate and require comprehensive approaches to fully quantify. Yet a common assumption in plant phenotyping efforts is that a few pre-selected measurements can adequately describe the relevant phenome space. Our poor understanding of the genetic basis of root system architecture is at least partially a result of this incongruence. Root systems are complex 3D structures that are most often studied as 2D representations measured with relatively simple univariate traits. In prior work, we showed that persistent homology, a topological data analysis method that does not pre-suppose the salient features of the data, could expand the phenotypic trait space and identify new G to P relations from a commonly used 2D root phenotyping platform. Here we extend the work to entire 3D root system architectures of maize seedlings from a mapping population that was designed to understand the genetic basis of maize-nitrogen relations. Using a panel of 84 univariate traits, persistent homology methods developed for 3D branching, and multivariate vectors of the collective trait space, we found that each method captures distinct information about root system variation as evidenced by the majority of non-overlapping QTL, and hence that root phenotypic trait space is not easily exhausted. The work offers a data-driven method for assessing 3D root structure and highlights the importance of non-canonical phenotypes for more accurate representations of the G to P map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.