Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288390›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2024

Knowledge of Oral Emergency Contraception Among Pharmacy Students.

Bria Nikole Blake, Samantha Bookbinder, Gweneth Lazenby, Amari Marshall, Elizabeth Weed, Michelle Meglin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bria Nikole BlakeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Samantha BookbinderCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Gweneth LazenbyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-442X
Amari MarshallCollege of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth WeedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcome Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Michelle MeglinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-5486
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to emergency contraception is an important consideration in preventing unintended pregnancies. Inconsistent information about emergency contraceptive given to patients at retail pharmacies may limit access. Objective: In this study, we aimed to assess pharmacy students' knowledge of oral emergency contraception. Methods: Students in a Doctor of Pharmacy program completed a confidential survey about their knowledge of and training on oral emergency contraception. Respondents self-reported demographics included age, race, ethnicity, gender, and year in pharmacy school. The survey questions assessed student knowledge of indications, availability, side effects, and mechanisms of action of oral emergency contraception, as well as their training on emergency contraception. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine if demographics influenced knowledge outcomes. A multivariate logistic regression, including age, gender, ethnicity, religion, year of training, hours of education, and source of knowledge acquisition, was used to adjust for confounding variables. Results: Among 296 pharmacy students, 31% (92/296) completed the survey. Among respondents, 34% (31/92) showed adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception based on four critical knowledge questions. Third- and fourth-year students were more likely to have adequate knowledge than first- and second-year students (odds ratio [OR], 2.70; confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-6.80). Students who reported learning about emergency contraception through reading assignments were more likely to have adequate knowledge than students who did not report learning from reading assignments (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.30-3.35). Conclusions: Most pharmacy students at a single academic center did not have adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception. These findings highlight the need for trainings to improve pharmacy student knowledge of oral emergency contraception.

Indexed as

emergency contraceptionlevonorgestrelpharmacy educationpharmacy studentsulipristal acetate

Identifiers

PMID38288390
PMCPMC10823165
OpenAlexW4391179265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.