Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as a first-line approach for cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke in large vessels of the anterior circulation.

Peng Zhiqiang, Chen Junchen, Cao Wenying, Zhao Dongqing, Ma Mi, Li Qiaowei, Zhu Zhenzhen, He Wanyi, Yang Biqing, Cao Minqi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng ZhiqiangDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chen JunchenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Cao WenyingDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhao DongqingDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ma MiDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li QiaoweiDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhu ZhenzhenDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
He WanyiDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yang BiqingDepartment of Stroke Center, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cao MinqiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Panyu District Central Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subject: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approaches for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke. Method: This retrospective observational study included patients with anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Patients were grouped according to the first-line approach they received: aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy. The primary outcome measure was the change in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from preoperative to immediate postoperative and from preoperative to discharge. Secondary indicators included the rate of favorable prognosis at discharge [Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2], successful vessel recanalization rate [modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score ≥ 2b], time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization, and perioperative complications. Result: The study included 127 cases, with 1 case withdrawal after enrollment due to a stroke of another determined cause, with 83 in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 43 cases in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change in NIHSS score from preoperative to immediate postoperative was 5 (1, 8) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 1 (0, 4.5) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The change from preoperative to discharge was 8 (5, 12) in the aspiration thrombectomy group and 4 (0, 9) in the stent retriever thrombectomy group. The aspiration thrombectomy group exhibited significantly better prognosis rates and shorter time from successful femoral artery puncture to successful vessel recanalization. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of successful vessel recanalization rates and perioperative complications. Conclusion: As a first-line approach for anterior circulation large vessel cardiogenic cerebral embolism and cryptogenic stroke, aspiration thrombectomy leads to better improvement in neurological functional deficits and prognosis rates compared to stent retriever thrombectomy.

Indexed as

acute large vessel occlusion strokeanterior circulationaspiration thrombectomycardiogenic cerebral embolismcryptogenic strokestent retriever thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID38288331
PMCPMC10824241
OpenAlexW4390885800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.