Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288304›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

The current situation of hereditary angioedema patients in Germany: results of an online survey.

Markus Magerl, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Lucia Schauf, Sven Pohl, Klaus Brendel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Optimizing conversations on treatment management in hereditary angioedema: healthcare professional and patient perspectives on long-term prophylaxis and shared decision-making.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus MagerlInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin [Charité University Medical Department] Berlin and Fraunhofer-Institut für Translationale Medizin und Pharmakologie ITMP [Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology], Standort Allergologie und Immunologie [Allergology and Immunology], Berlin, Germany.
Inmaculada Martinez-SaguerHämophilie-Zentrum Rhein Main [Hemophilia Center Rhein Main], Frankfurt, Germany.
Lucia SchaufHAE Vereinigung e.V. [HAE Association], Aldenhoven, Germany.
Sven PohlBioCryst Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Klaus BrendelPrimus Consulting Group GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare hereditary disease with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1 in 50,000. Methods: An online survey was performed between January and June 2021 on a total of 99 HAE patients (with 92 of them aged 15 years and older and 7 of them being parents of patients under the age of 15 years). They were asked about their current situation, with a focus on the disease. Results: The survey results show that HAE has a strong influence on the patients' quality of life. In particular, the anxiety and uncertainty of not knowing when a swelling attack will occur is considered burdensome by the patients. In addition, there can be physical problems during an attack (depending on its severity) that severely burden and limit patients in their everyday lives. Only one-third of the patients surveyed stated that no or only very minor physical limitations occurred during their most recent swelling attack. Almost three-quarters of all patients receive regular treatment at an HAE center. The patients are mostly satisfied with the therapy and particularly with long-term prophylactics (LTPs). When an LTP was used, the frequency and severity of the swelling attacks, and their duration, were significantly lower and/or shorter than when no LTP was used. Discussion: Despite the high level of satisfaction with their current medication, 62% of patients expressed a strong/very strong interest in an oral LTP. In the group of patients already using an LTP, 74% reported a strong/very strong interest in an oral medication for long-term prophylaxis. The simplicity and minimal time involved in LTP use are considered beneficial to patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

burden of diseasedisease controldisease managementhereditary angioedemalong-term prophylaxisoral therapyquality of lifetherapy satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38288304
PMCPMC10822932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.