ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024
Anterior Ankle Impingement Syndrome With Spur Fragmentation: Is It an Os Talotibiale?
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone fragments are often found in ankles with anterior bony impingement. However, whether they are detached osteophytes or accessory bones remains unknown. Methods: Among the 66 continuously enrolled cases of ankles with anterior bony impingement, 32 had a fragment located at the anterior margin of the tibia. The cases of posterior impingement, lateral instability, osteochondral lesions, or free bodies simultaneously treated were excluded. The enrolled subjects were classified into 2 groups: ankles without (group A) and with remarkable spurs (group B). The patients' backgrounds, location of the fragments, clinical scores, and other parameters required to resume sports were compared. The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle rating scale was used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative ankle conditions, and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire ( Results: Eight (seven subjects) and 11 ankles were classified into groups A and B, respectively, and the mean age of the 18 patients was 25.4 (range, 16-37) years. No statistical differences in patient backgrounds or fragment sizes between the groups existed. In group A, the fragments were located on the lateral plateau in 7 of the 8 ankles, whereas in group B, their locations varied. The patients were followed up for a median of 48 months (range, 24-168). No complications were observed. The postoperative JSSF and SAFE-Q sports activity scores were significantly higher in group A than in group B ( Conclusion: Anterior bony fragments of the ankle without a remarkable spur were located at a specific site, and the results of arthroscopic treatment were better than in those with remarkable spurs. Such a fragment may be called an os talotibiale. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.