Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288194›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Teleradiology and the Compensation Conundrum in India.

Harpreet Grewal, Niharika Prasad, Gagandeep Dhillon, Rahul Kashyap

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harpreet GrewalRadiology, Florida State University College of Medicine, Pensacola, USA.
Niharika PrasadRadiology, Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Gagandeep DhillonInternal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Glen Burnie, USA.
Rahul KashyapMedicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teleradiology, an established telemedicine practice globally, has significantly enhanced the accessibility of high-quality radiological interpretations in remote areas worldwide, especially in India, thereby improving healthcare outcomes. The utilization of teleradiology services has seen a marked increase, expanding its reach into more distant regions of the country. However, this burgeoning field faces numerous regulatory, financial, and technical challenges. The current scenario regarding teleradiology in India is a double-edged sword. There is an increasing demand for it due to the expanding population, resulting in larger imaging volumes needing radiologist services. This editorial aims to examine the prevailing challenges in teleradiology in India, with an emphasis on the compensation model for teleradiologists, which has not kept pace with the growing demand for services and often remains inequitable.

Indexed as

compensationdigital imaginghealthcare outcomesradiologist workloadteleradiology

Identifiers

PMID38288194
PMCPMC10824502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.