ArticleCureus2023
The Impact of Female Genital Mutilation on Sexual Function: A Study Conducted in Rural Sudan.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Low Dose Tadalafil Improve the Sexual Functions in Women with Genital Mutilation?International urogynecology journal · 2026Trial
- Health Literacy and Cultural Sensitivity in Spanish Online Breast Reduction Resources.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backroundThere are few studies comparing sexual function in women with female genital mutilation (FGM) in the literature, and most of these were evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Only one used the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS) questionnaire.
aimThis study aims to evaluate the effects of FGM on sexual function in Sudanese women who did or did not undergo FGM, using the FSFI and FGSIS questionnaires.
methodsThis descriptive study was conducted on Sudanese women from July 2020 to March 2021. Patients who attended to our hospital's gynecology outpatient clinic for health screening were included in this study. A total of 211 patients 113 with FGM and 98 without FGM were included in the study. The group with FGM was categorized according to the classification of the World Health Organization. The validated Arabic FSFI and FGSIS questionnaires were administered to groups with and without female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C).
resultsWhen the FGM types of the cases participating in the study were examined, patients with FGM were classified according to the FGM/C classification defined by the World Health Organization. They were classified as 20.4% (n=23) Type 1, 49.6% (n=56) Type 2, and 30.1% (n=34) Type 3. FSFI and FGSIS scores were significantly lower in the FGM/C group, especially in Type 3 with the highest tissue loss. The survey results statistically support the possibility of sexual dysfunction in FGM group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Female genital circumcision negatively affects sexual function. Therefore, clinicians should consider and sexual dysfunction in women with FGM attending primary care. Strengths and limitations: The strengths of this study are its originality, as it is the first study in the literature to use validated FGSIS and FSFI questionnaires together to assess sexual function in groups with and without FGM and to evaluate correlation of questionnaire results. We undertook the study it using validated and reliable scales, trained clinical staff, local staff gynecologist, and multivariate analysis. Limitation of the study is the chosen age range. The reason for limiting the age to under 35 is that we wanted to evaluate the more sexually active age group in our study. We cannot comment on the correlation of FSFI and FGSIS in circumcised patients over 35 years of age.
conclusionSexual function and sexual self-image of women with FGM/C were found to be significantly lower compared to women without FGM when compared with the validated FSFI and FGSIS questionnaires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.