Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288089›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology

Swim-up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation for preserving sperm DNA integrity during sperm processing.

Kenji Amano, Satoko Oigawa, Koichiro Ichizawa, Yukiko Tokuda, Mami Unagami, Mami Sekiguchi, Mayuko Furui, Kentaro Nakaoka, Ayumu Ito, Rika Hayashi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. On the state of chromatin in mammalian sperm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In vitro models of the male reproductive system: applications for developmental and reproductive toxicology.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kenji AmanoReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5719-050X
Satoko OigawaReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Koichiro IchizawaReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yukiko TokudaReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Mami UnagamiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Mami SekiguchiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Mayuko FuruiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-2335
Kentaro NakaokaReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Ayumu ItoReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9102-2322
Rika HayashiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yuko TamakiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yuko HayashiReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yusuke FukudaReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
Yukiko KatagiriReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-896X
Masahiko NakataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Toho University Tokyo Japan.
Koichi NagaoReproduction Center, Toho University Omori Medical Center Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of swim-up and density gradient centrifugation methods on sperm DNA fragmentation. Methods: Nineteen normozoospermic patient samples with ≥100 × 10 Results: Sperm DNA fragmentation was not statistically different between swim-up-(14.4 ± 2.1%, Conclusions: The swim-up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation, evidenced by less sperm DNA fragmentation and higher sperm progressive motility. The recovery rate of progressive motile sperms was better after density gradient centrifugation than after swim-up.

Indexed as

density gradient centrifugationin situ nick‐end labelingsperm DNA fragmentationsperm progressive motilityswim‐up

Identifiers

PMID38288089
PMCPMC10823384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.