Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288018›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Knowledge structure and global trends of machine learning in stroke over the past decade: A scientometric analysis.

Mingfen Wu, Kefu Yu, Zhigang Zhao, Bin Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mingfen WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Kefu YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Zhigang ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Bin ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Machine learning (ML) models have been widely applied in stroke prediction, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis assessment. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive scientometrics analysis of studies related to ML in stroke and reveal its current status, knowledge structure, and global trends. Methods: All documents related to ML in stroke were retrieved from the Web of Science database on March 15, 2023. We refined the documents by including only original articles and reviews in the English language. The literature published over the past decade was imported into scientometrics software for influence detection and collaborative network analysis. Results: 2389 related publications were included. The annual publication outputs demonstrated explosive growth, with an average growth rate of 63.99 %. Among the 90 countries/regions involved, the United States (729 articles) and China (636 articles) were the most productive countries. Frontiers in Neurology was the most prolific journal with 94 articles. 234 highly cited articles, each with more than 31 citations, were detected. Keyword analysis revealed a total of 5333 keywords, with a predominant focus on the application of ML models in the early diagnosis, classification, and prediction of "acute ischemic stroke" and "atrial fibrillation-related stroke". The keyword "classification" had the first and longest burst, spanning from 2013 to 2018. 'Upport vector machine' got the strongest burst strength with 6.2. Keywords such as 'mechanical thrombectomy', 'expression', and 'prognosis' experienced bursts in 2022 and have continued to be prominent. Conclusion: The applications of ML in stroke are increasingly diverse and extensive, with researchers showing growing interest over the past decade. However, the clinical application of ML in stroke is still in its early stages, and several limitations and challenges need to be addressed for its widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmDeep learningGlobal trendsMachine learningStroke

Identifiers

PMID38288018
PMCPMC10823080
OpenAlexW4390822126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.