Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38288004›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2022

Ranking tailoring variables for constructing individualized treatment rules: an application to schizophrenia.

Jiacheng Wu, Nina Galanter, Susan M Shortreed, Erica E M Moodie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiacheng WuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Nina GalanterUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Susan M ShortreedKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA, and University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Erica E M MoodieMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental HealthT32ES015459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI June T. Spector · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
Improved tailoring of depression care using customized clinical decision supportR01MH114873 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOODIE, ERICA, SHORTREED, SUSAN M · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015459NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As with many chronic conditions, matching patients with schizophrenia to the best treatment options is difficult. Selecting antipsychotic medication is especially challenging because many of the medications can have burdensome side effects. Adjusting or tailoring medications based on patients' characteristics could improve symptoms. However, it is often not known which patient characteristics are most helpful for informing treatment selection. In this paper, we address the challenge of identifying and ranking important variables for tailoring treatment decisions. We consider a value-search approach implemented through dynamic marginal structural models to estimate an optimal individualized treatment rule. We apply our methodology to the Clinical Antipsychotics Trial of Intervention and Effectiveness (CATIE) study for schizophrenia, to evaluate if some tailoring variables have greater potential than others for selecting treatments for patients with schizophrenia (Stroup et al., 2003).

Indexed as

Causal effectsInverse probability weightingMarginal structural modelsPrecision medicineSchizophreniaVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID38288004
PMCPMC10823524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.