ArticleStatistics in medicine2024
Addressing subject heterogeneity in time-dependent discrimination for biomarker evaluation.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing nonignorable missing data and heterogeneity in prognostic biomarker assessment.Statistical methods in medical research · 2026Article
- Accounting for Competing Risks in the Assessment of Prognostic Biomarkers' Discriminative Accuracy.Statistics in biosciences · 2025Article
- Breaking new ground: machine learning enhances survival forecasts in hypercapnic respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate discrimination has been the central goal in identifying biomarkers for monitoring disease progression and early detection. Acknowledging the fact that discrimination accuracy of biomarkers for a time-to-event outcome often changes over time, local measures such as the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and its area under the curve (AUC) are used to assess time-dependent predictive discrimination. However, such measures do not address subject heterogeneity, although the impact of covariates including demographics, disease-related characteristics, and other clinical information on the discriminatory performance of biomarkers needs to be investigated before their clinical use. We propose the covariate-specific time-dependent AUC, a measure for covariate-adjusted discrimination. We develop a regression model on the covariate-specific time-dependent AUC to understand how and in what magnitude the covariates influence biomarker performance. Then we construct a pseudo partial-likelihood for estimation and inference. This is followed by our establishing the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and provide variance estimation. The simulation studies and application to the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 175 data demonstrate that the proposed method offers an informative tool for inferring covariate-specific and time-dependent predictive discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.