Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287424›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Impact of Menstrual cycle-based Periodized training on Aerobic performance, a Clinical Trial study protocol-the IMPACT study.

Linda Ekenros, Philip von Rosen, Jessica Norrbom, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Carl Johan Sundberg, Cecilia Fridén, Angelica Lindén Hirschberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05697263 (The Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on Physical Exercise and Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05697263 narecruitingnot on this map

The Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on Physical Exercise and Performance

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2023 to 2027Enrolled111ConditionsMenstrual Cycle, Exercise, Women's Health, Athletic PerformanceArmsPeriodization of training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda EkenrosDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden. linda.ekenros@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5600-4180
Philip von RosenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Jessica NorrbomDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Molecular Exercise Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Hans-Christer HolmbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Molecular Exercise Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Carl Johan SundbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Molecular Exercise Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Cecilia Fridén *Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Angelica Lindén Hirschberg *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELuleå University of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe menstrual cycle and its impact on training and performance are of growing interest. However, evidence is lacking whether periodized exercise based on the menstrual cycle is beneficial. The primary purpose of this proposed randomized, controlled trial, the IMPACT study, is to evaluate the effect of exercise periodization during different phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e., comparing follicular phase-based and luteal phase-based training with regular training during the menstrual cycle on physical performance in well-trained women.

methodsHealthy, well-trained, eumenorrheic women between 18 and 35 years (n = 120) will be recruited and first assessed for physical performance during a run-in menstrual cycle at different cycle phases and then randomized to three different interventions: follicular phase-based training, luteal phase-based training, or regular training during three menstrual cycles. The training intervention will consist of high-intensity spinning classes followed by strength training. The menstrual cycle phases will be determined by serum hormone analysis throughout the intervention period. Assessment of aerobic performance (primary outcome) and muscle strength, body composition, and blood markers will be performed at baseline and at the end of the intervention. DISCUSSION: With a robust methodology, this study has the potential to provide evidence of the differential effects of exercise periodization during different phases of the menstrual cycle in female athletes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05697263 . Registered on 25 January 2023.

Indexed as

Luteal PhaseMenstrual CycleExerciseFemaleFollicular PhaseHumansMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAerobic performanceFemale athleteFemale sex hormonesFollicular phase-based trainingLuteal phase-based trainingMenstrual cyclePeriodized training

Identifiers

PMID38287424
PMCPMC10823667
OpenAlexW4391321903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.