Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287415›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Fall risk classification with posturographic parameters in community-dwelling older adults: a machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach.

Huey-Wen Liang, Rasoul Ameri, Shahab Band, Hsin-Shui Chen, Sung-Yu Ho, Bilal Zaidan, Kai-Chieh Chang, Arthur Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huey-Wen LiangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Rasoul AmeriDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
Shahab BandInternational Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC. shahab@yuntech.edu.tw.
Hsin-Shui ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Yulin Branch, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC. p10744018@emba.ntu.edu.tw.
Sung-Yu HoDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
Bilal ZaidanInternational Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
Kai-Chieh ChangDepartment of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Yulin Branch, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
Arthur ChangDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.

Funding

National Taiwan University Hospital Yulin Branch NTUHYL 111. AI004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputerized posturography obtained in standing conditions has been applied to classify fall risk for older adults or disease groups. Combining machine learning (ML) approaches is superior to traditional regression analysis for its ability to handle complex data regarding its characteristics of being high-dimensional, non-linear, and highly correlated. The study goal was to use ML algorithms to classify fall risks in community-dwelling older adults with the aid of an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach to increase interpretability.

methodsA total of 215 participants were included for analysis. The input information included personal metrics and posturographic parameters obtained from a tracker-based posturography of four standing postures. Two classification criteria were used: with a previous history of falls and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test. We used three meta-heuristic methods for feature selection to handle the large numbers of parameters and improve efficacy, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to display the weights of the selected features on the model.

resultsThe results showed that posturographic parameters could classify the participants with TUG scores higher or lower than 10 s but were less effective in classifying fall risk according to previous fall history. Feature selections improved the accuracy with the TUG as the classification label, and the Slime Mould Algorithm had the best performance (accuracy: 0.72 to 0.77, area under the curve: 0.80 to 0.90). In contrast, feature selection did not improve the model performance significantly with the previous fall history as a classification label. The SHAP values also helped to display the importance of different features in the model.

conclusionPosturographic parameters in standing can be used to classify fall risks with high accuracy based on the TUG scores in community-dwelling older adults. Using feature selection improves the model's performance. The results highlight the potential utility of ML algorithms and XAI to provide guidance for developing more robust and accurate fall classification models. Trial registration Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIndependent LivingAgedHumansMachine LearningPhysical Therapy ModalitiesFallsMachine learningOlder adultsRisk classificationTrunk sway

Identifiers

PMID38287415
PMCPMC10826018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.