Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287378›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

"Whatever journey you want to take, I'll support you through": a mixed methods evaluation of a peer worker program in the hospital emergency department.

Meghan O'Neill, Camilla Michalski, Kate Hayman, Jennifer Hulme, Neighbourhood Group Community Services(Lorie Steer), Sané Dube, Lori M Diemert, Kathy Kornas, Alice Schoffel, Laura C Rosella and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "Social admissions" to hospital are not personal failures but policy ones.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meghan O'NeillPopulation Health Analytics Lab, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Camilla MichalskiPopulation Health Analytics Lab, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kate HaymanUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer HulmeUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neighbourhood Group Community Services(Lorie Steer)
Sané DubeUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lori M DiemertPopulation Health Analytics Lab, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathy KornasPopulation Health Analytics Lab, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alice SchoffelUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laura C RosellaPopulation Health Analytics Lab, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew BoozaryUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. andrew.boozary@uhn.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who are unhoused, use substances (drugs and/or alcohol), and who have mental health conditions experience barriers to care access and are frequently confronted with discrimination and stigma in health care settings. The role of Peer Workers in addressing these gaps in a hospital-based context is not well characterized. The aim of this evaluation was to 1) outline the role of Peer Workers in the care of a marginalized populations in the emergency department; 2) characterize the impact of Peer Workers on patient care, and 3) to describe how being employed as a Peer Worker impacts the Peer.

methodsThrough a concurrent mixed methods evaluation, we explore the role of Peer Workers in the care of marginalized populations in the emergency department at two urban hospitals in Toronto, Ontario Canada. We describe the demographic characteristics of patients (n = 555) and the type of supports provided to patients collected through a survey between February and June 2022. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were completed with Peer Workers (n = 7). Interviews were thematically analyzed using a deductive approach, complemented by an inductive approach to allow new themes to emerge from the data.

resultsSupport provided to patients primarily consisted of friendly conversations (91.4%), discharge planning (59.6%), tactics to help the patient navigate their emotions/mental wellbeing (57.8%) and sharing their lived experience (50.1%). In over one third (38.9%) of all patient interactions, Peer Workers shared new information about the patient with the health care team (e.g., obtaining patient identification). Five major themes emerged from our interviews with Peer Workers which include: (1) Establishing empathy and building trust between the patient and their care team through self-disclosure; (2) Facilitating a person-centered approach to patient care through trauma-informed listening and accessible language; (3) Support for patient preferences on harm reduction; (4) Peer worker role facilitating self-acceptance and self-defined recovery; and (5) Importance of supports and resources to help Peer Workers navigate the emotional intensity of the emergency department.

conclusionsThe findings add to the literature on Peer Worker programs and how such interventions are designed to best meet the needs of marginalized populations.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPeer GroupEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsHumansOntarioHarm reductionHospital-based careMixed-methodsPeer worker

Identifiers

PMID38287378
PMCPMC10826204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.