Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287356›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Development of a machine learning-based radiomics signature for estimating breast cancer TME phenotypes and predicting anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy response.

Xiaorui Han, Yuan Guo, Huifen Ye, Zhihong Chen, Qingru Hu, Xinhua Wei, Zaiyi Liu, Changhong Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mammographic radiomics and breast density for predicting PD-L1 expression in breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Predictive value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaorui HanSchool of Medicine South, China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yuan GuoDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Huifen YeDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhihong ChenInstitute of Computing Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qingru HuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xinhua WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China. eyxinhuawei@scut.edu.cn.
Zaiyi LiuSchool of Medicine South, China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. liuzaiyi@gdph.org.cn.
Changhong LiangSchool of Medicine South, China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. liangchanghong@gdph.org.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application 2022B1212010011High-level Hospital Construction Project DFJHBF202105Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2021B0101420006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271941Regional Innovation and Development Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsSince breast cancer patients respond diversely to immunotherapy, there is an urgent need to explore novel biomarkers to precisely predict clinical responses and enhance therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of our present research was to construct and independently validate a biomarker of tumor microenvironment (TME) phenotypes via a machine learning-based radiomics way. The interrelationship between the biomarker, TME phenotypes and recipients' clinical response was also revealed.

methodsIn this retrospective multi-cohort investigation, five separate cohorts of breast cancer patients were recruited to measure breast cancer TME phenotypes via a radiomics signature, which was constructed and validated by integrating RNA-seq data with DCE-MRI images for predicting immunotherapy response. Initially, we constructed TME phenotypes using RNA-seq of 1089 breast cancer patients in the TCGA database. Then, parallel DCE-MRI images and RNA-seq of 94 breast cancer patients obtained from TCIA were applied to develop a radiomics-based TME phenotypes signature using random forest in machine learning. The repeatability of the radiomics signature was then validated in an internal validation set. Two additional independent external validation sets were analyzed to reassess this signature. The Immune phenotype cohort (n = 158) was divided based on CD8 cell infiltration into immune-inflamed and immune-desert phenotypes; these data were utilized to examine the relationship between the immune phenotypes and this signature. Finally, we utilized an Immunotherapy-treated cohort with 77 cases who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment to evaluate the predictive efficiency of this signature in terms of clinical outcomes.

resultsThe TME phenotypes of breast cancer were separated into two heterogeneous clusters: Cluster A, an "immune-inflamed" cluster, containing substantial innate and adaptive immune cell infiltration, and Cluster B, an "immune-desert" cluster, with modest TME cell infiltration. We constructed a radiomics signature for the TME phenotypes ([AUC] = 0.855; 95% CI 0.777-0.932; p < 0.05) and verified it in an internal validation set (0.844; 0.606-1; p < 0.05). In the known immune phenotypes cohort, the signature can identify either immune-inflamed or immune-desert tumor (0.814; 0.717-0.911; p < 0.05). In the Immunotherapy-treated cohort, patients with objective response had higher baseline radiomics scores than those with stable or progressing disease (p < 0.05); moreover, the radiomics signature achieved an AUC of 0.784 (0.643-0.926; p < 0.05) for predicting immunotherapy response.

conclusionsOur imaging biomarker, a practicable radiomics signature, is beneficial for predicting the TME phenotypes and clinical response in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-treated breast cancer patients. It is particularly effective in identifying the "immune-desert" phenotype and may aid in its transformation into an "immune-inflamed" phenotype.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMachine LearningPhenotypeRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersBreast cancerMachine learningRadiomics signatureTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38287356
PMCPMC10823720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.