Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287351›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2024

Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review.

Olivia King, Emma West, Laura Alston, Hannah Beks, Michele Callisaya, Catherine E Huggins, Margaret Murray, Kevin Mc Namara, Michael Pang, Warren Payne and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Developing Implementation Strategies for the Adoption of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: A Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Olivia KingWestern Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia. o.king@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-2891
Emma WestWestern Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Laura AlstonDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Hannah BeksDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Michele CallisayaPeninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Catherine E HugginsGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Margaret MurrayDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Kevin Mc NamaraDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Michael PangGrampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.
Warren PayneWestern Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Anna PeetersWestern Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Mia PithieGrampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.
Alesha M SaynerDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
Anna Wong SheeDeakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.

Funding

MRFF RARUR000072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuilding healthcare service and health professionals' capacity and capability to rapidly translate research evidence into health practice is critical to the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems. This review scoped the literature describing programmes to build knowledge translation capacity and capability in health professionals and healthcare services, and the evidence supporting these.

methodsThis scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo) were searched using a pre-determined strategy. Eligible studies described a programme implemented in healthcare settings to build health professional or healthcare service knowledge translation capacity and capability. Abstracts and full texts considered for inclusion were screened by two researchers. Data from included papers were extracted using a bespoke tool informed by the scoping review questions.

resultsDatabase searches yielded 10,509 unique citations, of which 136 full texts were reviewed. Thirty-four papers were included, with three additional papers identified on citation searching, resulting in 37 papers describing 34 knowledge translation capability building programmes. Programmes were often multifaceted, comprising a combination of two or more strategies including education, dedicated implementation support roles, strategic research-practice partnerships and collaborations, co-designed knowledge translation capability building programmes, and dedicated funding for knowledge translation. Many programmes utilised experiential and collaborative learning, and targeted either individual, team, organisational, or system levels of impact. Twenty-seven programmes were evaluated formally using one or more data collection methods. Outcomes measured varied significantly and included participant self-reported outcomes, perceived barriers and enablers of knowledge translation, milestone achievement and behaviour change. All papers reported that programme objectives were achieved to varying degrees.

conclusionsKnowledge translation capacity and capability building programmes in healthcare settings are multifaceted, often include education to facilitate experiential and collaborative learning, and target individual, team, organisational, or supra-organisational levels of impact. Although measured differently across the programmes, the outcomes were positive. The sustainability of programmes and outcomes may be undermined by the lack of long-term funding and inconsistent evaluation. Future research is required to develop evidence-informed frameworks to guide methods and outcome measures for short-, medium- and longer-term programme evaluation at the different structural levels.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelTranslational Science, BiomedicalCapacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansOrganizationsCapacity buildingHealthcareImplementationKnowledge translationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38287351
PMCPMC10823722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.