Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287327›Full record

ReviewBMC medical genomics2024

Whole genome sequencing in clinical practice.

Frederik Otzen Bagger, Line Borgwardt, Andreas Sand Jespersen, Anna Reimer Hansen, Birgitte Bertelsen, Miyako Kodama, Finn Cilius Nielsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacogenomics in oncology: mutation-targeted therapy and biomarker integration in non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frederik Otzen Bagger *Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Line Borgwardt *Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas Sand JespersenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna Reimer HansenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte BertelsenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Miyako KodamaCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Finn Cilius NielsenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. finn.cilius.nielsen@regionh.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming the preferred method for molecular genetic diagnosis of rare and unknown diseases and for identification of actionable cancer drivers. Compared to other molecular genetic methods, WGS captures most genomic variation and eliminates the need for sequential genetic testing. Whereas, the laboratory requirements are similar to conventional molecular genetics, the amount of data is large and WGS requires a comprehensive computational and storage infrastructure in order to facilitate data processing within a clinically relevant timeframe. The output of a single WGS analyses is roughly 5 MIO variants and data interpretation involves specialized staff collaborating with the clinical specialists in order to provide standard of care reports. Although the field is continuously refining the standards for variant classification, there are still unresolved issues associated with the clinical application. The review provides an overview of WGS in clinical practice - describing the technology and current applications as well as challenges connected with data processing, interpretation and clinical reporting.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenetic VariationHumansWhole Genome SequencingClinical bioinformatics infrastructureFunctional variant testingVariant filtering and interpretationWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38287327
PMCPMC10823711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.