Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287256›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Assessment of Bla

Manal Ismail Abdalla Mohammedkheir, Elsheikh Mahgoub Gaafar, Eltayeb GareebAlla Eltayeb AbdAlla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotics Resistance Profile of Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manal Ismail Abdalla MohammedkheirSudan International University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Elsheikh Mahgoub GaafarUniversity of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Eltayeb GareebAlla Eltayeb AbdAllaUniversity of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. eltayebge88@gmail.com.
Alzaiem Alazhari University · SDUniversity of Khartoum · SDUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGram-negative bacilli are the most common etiological agents responsible for urinary tract infections. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is increasing at a rapid pace globally, which is constraining the available choices for UTI treatment. The objectives of this study are to identify the most common causal organisms of urinary tract infections (UTIs), and to determine their drug resistance patterns. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted at El-Amal Hospital, Bahri Teaching Hospital, and Al-Baraha Hospital, Khartoum State, from March to October 2022. Urine samples from patients suspected to have UTI were collected, and patients with confirmed UTI by laboratory investigations and yielded culture growth were enrolled. Antibiotic sensitivity testing and PCR testing of the bla

resultsThis study included 50 patients with UTI out of 229 suspected patients (21.8%). The most prominent group of patients was older than 60 years (40%); the majority were females (70%). Escherichia coli was the most prevalent isolated organism (50%), followed by Klebsiella oxytoca (24%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (20%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4%), and Citrobacter freundii (2%). A small percentage of organisms were resistant to colistin (17%). However, 77% were resistant to amikacin, 97.6% to cefotaxime, 96.8% to ceftazidime, 97.6% to ceftriaxone, 96.8% to cefixime, 87.6% to ciprofloxacin, 88.4% to gentamycin, 62% to imipenem, 67.6% to meropenem, 87.6% to norfloxacin, and 95.6% to trimethoprim. The overall resistance of isolated gram-negative organisms was 81%. The most prevalent gene for the resistance was bla

conclusionEscherichia coli and Klebsiella species were the most commonly isolated uropathogens in this study, and the majority were highly resistant to most of the antimicrobial agents tested. Resistance genes bla

Indexed as

Escherichia coliUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntibiotic resistanceResistance genesUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID38287256
PMCPMC10826001
OpenAlexW4391323856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.