ArticleScientific reports2024
Fish diversity and selection of taxa for conservation in the Salween and Irrawaddy Rivers, Southeast Asia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haplotype-resolved genome ofZoological research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species diversity indices provide quantitative data for understanding the variations and trends in fish species diversity, as well as information on species richness and evenness. However, these diversity indices do not reflect differences in specific taxa, which can be of importance as key conservation targets, especially during the planning and construction of protected areas. In this study, simultaneously combining our improved traditional fish fauna analysis (TFFA) with the value of fish fauna presence (VFFP) methods, we studied fish diversity in the Salween and Irrawaddy basins. The results of the TFFA reflected the families (subfamilies) and genera that constitute the main body of fish diversity in the river basins. The results of the VFFP assessment showed which families (subfamilies) and genera were representative of certain characteristics in the basins. The VFFP scores of genera could be used as indicator indices and as priority taxa in the planning and construction of fish resource reserves. In this paper, we propose for the first time that the role and status of monotypic genera (genera comprising only a single species) in the conservation of fish diversity should not be ignored, and they should rather be a priority for protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.