Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of medical technologies may be predicted using constructed graph bibliometrics.

Lawrence Jiang, Ashir Raza, Abdel-Badih El Ariss, David Chen, Nicole Danaher-Garcia, Jarone Lee, Shuhan He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lawrence JiangDuke University, Durham, USA. lawrence.jiang@duke.edu.
Ashir RazaDuke University, Durham, USA.
Abdel-Badih El ArissDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
David ChenTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Nicole Danaher-GarciaSchool of Healthcare Leadership, Institute of Health Professions, Boston, USA.
Jarone LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Shuhan HeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific research is driven by allocation of funding to different research projects based in part on the predicted scientific impact of the work. Data-driven algorithms can inform decision-making of scarce funding resources by identifying likely high-impact studies using bibliometrics. Compared to standardized citation-based metrics alone, we utilize a machine learning pipeline that analyzes high-dimensional relationships among a range of bibliometric features to improve the accuracy of predicting high-impact research. Random forest classification models were trained using 28 bibliometric features calculated from a dataset of 1,485,958 publications in medicine to retrospectively predict whether a publication would become high-impact. For each random forest model, the balanced accuracy score was above 0.95 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was above 0.99. The high performance of high impact research prediction using our proposed models show that machine learning technologies are promising algorithms that can support funding decision-making for medical research.

Indexed as

BibliometricsMedicineAlgorithmsMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38287044
PMCPMC10824713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.