Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286884›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Adjuvant Therapy After Upfront Resection of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Patterns of Omission and Use-A Prospective Real-Life Study.

Salvatore Paiella, Giuseppe Malleo, Gabriella Lionetto, Alice Cattelani, Fabio Casciani, Erica Secchettin, Matteo De Pastena, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03788382 (Failure to Adjuvant Therapy After Pancreatic Resection for Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03788382 completednot on this map

Failure to Adjuvant Therapy After Pancreatic Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: a Real Life Scenario

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversita di VeronaRan2019 to 2024Enrolled317ConditionsPancreatic Malignant Neoplasm Primary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salvatore PaiellaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Salvatore.paiella@univr.it.
Giuseppe MalleoGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Gabriella LionettoGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alice CattelaniGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fabio CascianiGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Erica SecchettinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Matteo De PastenaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudio BassiGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto SalviaGeneral and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Roberto.salvia@univr.it.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

Fondazione Italiana Malattie Pancreas (FIMP) - Italian Ministry of Health CUP_J38D19000690001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about adjuvant therapy (AT) omission and use outside of randomized trials. We aimed to assess the patterns of AT omission and use in a cohort of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients in a real-life scenario.

methodsFrom January 2019 to July 2022, 317 patients with resected pancreatic cancer and operated upfront were prospectively enrolled in this prospective observational trial according to the previously calculated sample size. The association between perioperative variables and the risk of AT omission and AT delay was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsEighty patients (25.2%) did not receive AT. The main reasons for AT omission were postoperative complications (38.8%), oncologist's choice (21.2%), baseline comorbidities (20%), patient's choice (10%), and early recurrence (10%). At the multivariable analysis, the odds of not receiving AT increased significantly for older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, p < 0.001), those having an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥II (OR 2.03, p = 0.015), or developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 2.5, p = 0.019). The likelihood of not receiving FOLFIRINOX as AT increased for older patients (OR 1.1, p < 0.001), in the presence of early-stage disease (stage I-IIa vs. IIb-III, OR 2.82, p =0.031; N0 vs. N+, OR 3, p = 0.03), and for patients who experienced postoperative major complications (OR 4.7, p = 0.009). A twofold increased likelihood of delay in AT was found in patients experiencing postoperative complications (OR 3.86, p = 0.011).

conclusionsAT is not delivered in about one-quarter of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients. Age, comorbidities, and postoperative complications are the main drivers of AT omission and mFOLFIRINOX non-use. CLINICALTRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03788382.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesAdjuvant therapyFailure to rescuePancreatic cancerPancreatic surgeryPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID38286884
PMCPMC10997715
OpenAlexW4391304157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.