Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Adjuvant Therapy After Upfront Resection of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Patterns of Omission and Use-A Prospective Real-Life Study.
Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03788382 (Failure to Adjuvant Therapy After Pancreatic Resection for Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Failure to Adjuvant Therapy After Pancreatic Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: a Real Life Scenario
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Postoperative Complications Impact Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Left-Side Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- CT-derived body composition predicts futile upfront resection in pancreatic cancer: a multicenter study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Preoperative Risk Assessment of Pancreatic Fistula Impact on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Delivery After Pancreatoduodenectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Association of Cancer Center Designation with Multimodality Treatment, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival among Older Adults with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Area-based centralization of pancreatic surgery: a Hub-and-Spoke system balances patient proximity and quality of care.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Higher lymph node burden predicts greater chemotherapy benefit in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evidence from 22,045 patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Initiation and Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Total Versus Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Perioperative Management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Insights Into Modified FOLFIRINOX Relative Dose Intensity and CA 19-9 Dynamics.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about adjuvant therapy (AT) omission and use outside of randomized trials. We aimed to assess the patterns of AT omission and use in a cohort of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients in a real-life scenario.
methodsFrom January 2019 to July 2022, 317 patients with resected pancreatic cancer and operated upfront were prospectively enrolled in this prospective observational trial according to the previously calculated sample size. The association between perioperative variables and the risk of AT omission and AT delay was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsEighty patients (25.2%) did not receive AT. The main reasons for AT omission were postoperative complications (38.8%), oncologist's choice (21.2%), baseline comorbidities (20%), patient's choice (10%), and early recurrence (10%). At the multivariable analysis, the odds of not receiving AT increased significantly for older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, p < 0.001), those having an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥II (OR 2.03, p = 0.015), or developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 2.5, p = 0.019). The likelihood of not receiving FOLFIRINOX as AT increased for older patients (OR 1.1, p < 0.001), in the presence of early-stage disease (stage I-IIa vs. IIb-III, OR 2.82, p =0.031; N0 vs. N+, OR 3, p = 0.03), and for patients who experienced postoperative major complications (OR 4.7, p = 0.009). A twofold increased likelihood of delay in AT was found in patients experiencing postoperative complications (OR 3.86, p = 0.011).
conclusionsAT is not delivered in about one-quarter of upfront resected pancreatic cancer patients. Age, comorbidities, and postoperative complications are the main drivers of AT omission and mFOLFIRINOX non-use. CLINICALTRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03788382.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.