Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286846›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Financial toxicity among people with metastatic cancer: findings from the Cancer Experience Registry.

Michelle A Mollica, Alexandra K Zaleta, Lisa Gallicchio, Rachelle Brick, Paul B Jacobsen, Emily Tonorezos, Kathleen M Castro, Melissa F Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle A MollicaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alexandra K ZaletaResearch and Training Institute, Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC, USA.
Lisa GallicchioDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rachelle BrickDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul B JacobsenDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Emily TonorezosDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kathleen M CastroDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Melissa F MillerResearch and Training Institute, Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC, USA. melissa@cancersupportcommunity.org.
National Cancer Institute · USCancer Support Community · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study describes financial toxicity (FT) reported by people with metastatic cancer, characteristics associated with FT, and associations between FT and compensatory strategies to offset costs.

methodsCancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry data was used to identify respondents with a solid tumor metastatic cancer who completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) measure. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between respondent characteristics and FT, and FT and postponing medical visits, nonadherence to medications, and postponing supportive and/or psychosocial care.

results484 individuals were included in the analysis; the most common cancers included metastatic breast (31%), lung (13%), gynecologic (10%), and colorectal (9%). Approximately half of participants (50.2%) reported some degree of FT. Those who were non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, or multiple races (compared to non-Hispanic Black), and who reported lower income, less education, and being less than one year since their cancer diagnosis had greater odds of reporting FT. Individuals with any level of FT were also more likely to report postponing medical visits (Adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 2.58; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.45-4.58), suboptimal medication adherence (Adjusted OR 5.05; 95% CI 2.77-9.20) and postponing supportive care and/or psychosocial support services (Adjusted OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.53-6.85) compared to those without FT.

conclusionsWith increases in the number of people living longer with metastatic cancer and the rising costs of therapy, there will continue to be a need to systematically screen and intervene to prevent and mitigate FT for these survivors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryCost of IllnessFemaleFinancial StressHealth ExpendituresHumansRegistriesCancer survivorsFinancial hardshipFinancial toxicityMetastatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID38286846
OpenAlexW4391328719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.