ArticleBMJ open2024
Utilisation of community healthcare services among older adults with disabilities in Luohu district, Shenzhen: a community-based survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A dual-capability digital portrait framework for identifying community age-friendly service needs.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Monitoring and evaluation of health disparities for people with disability in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Epidemiologic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChina faces the challenge of an ageing population with disabilities. Community healthcare centres (CHCs) serve as frontline community healthcare providers for older adults with and without disabilities. Despite their significance, there is a lack of literature examining the utilisation of CHC services among older adults. This study aims to examine and compare the utilisation and satisfaction of CHC healthcare services among older adults with and without disabilities.
settingData from the 2019 Community Health Diagnosis Questionnaire, which interviewed 259 older adults residing in the Luohu district of Shenzhen, were used in the current study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants self-reported outcomes including use of CHCs, use of home health services from CHCs and satisfaction with CHCs. Five different disability types and an integrated disability variable were assessed as independent variables. Linear probability models were used to determine the relationship between disability types and outcome variables.
resultsAmong 259 older adults aged 60 years and older, 70.66% self-identified as having a disability. No statistically significant associations were found between the use of CHCs, the use of home health services from CHCs and satisfaction with CHCs, and disability status. However, older adults with mobility and cognitive disabilities were more likely to receive home health services from CHCs.
conclusionCommunity health promotion policies should be implemented to improve access to health services for older adults with and without disabilities. In addition, CHCs should implement effective health management plans to ensure the health needs of older adults with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.