Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286705›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Mixed-methods randomised study exploring the feasibility and acceptability of eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing for improving the mental health of traumatised survivors of intensive care following hospital discharge: protocol.

Andrew Bates, Hannah Golding, Sophie Rushbrook, Julie Highfield, Natalie Pattison, David Baldwin, Michael P W Grocott, Rebecca Cusack

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05591625 (A Multi-centre, Randomised, Pilot Feasibility Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Eye-movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Versus Usual Care in the Psychological Recovery of Intensive Care Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05591625 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Multi-centre, Randomised, Pilot Feasibility Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Eye-movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Versus Usual Care in the Psychological Recovery of Intensive Care Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2023 to 2025Enrolled160ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress Disorder, Critical Illness, Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing, Depression, AnxietyArmsEye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew BatesPerioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK a.bates@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3614-0270
Hannah GoldingPerioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sophie RushbrookDorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Julie HighfieldCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Natalie PattisonUniversity of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
David BaldwinClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michael P W GrocottPerioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Rebecca CusackPerioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBDorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-traumatic symptoms are common among patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs), adversely affecting well-being, increasing healthcare utilisation and delaying return to work. Non-pharmacological approaches (eg, music, therapeutic touch and patient diaries) have been suggested as candidate interventions and trauma-focused psychological interventions have been endorsed by international bodies. Neither category of intervention is supported by definitive evidence of long-term clinical effectiveness in patients who have been critically ill. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of using eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) to improve the mental health of ICU survivors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EMERALD is a multicentre, two-part consent, pilot feasibility study, recruiting discharged ICU survivors from three hospitals in the UK. We are gathering demographics and measuring post-traumatic symptoms, anxiety, depression and quality of life at baseline. Two months after discharge, participants are screened for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Patients with IES-R scores<22 continue in an observation arm for 12 month follow-up. IES-R scores≥22 indicate above-threshold PTSD symptoms and trigger invitation to consent for part B: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of EMDR versus usual care, with 1:1 randomisation. The study assesses feasibility (recruitment, retention and intervention fidelity) and acceptability (through semistructured interviews), using a theoretical acceptability framework. Clinical outcomes (PTSD, anxiety, depression and quality of life) are collected at baseline, 2 and 12 months, informing power calculations for a definitive RCT, with quantitative and qualitative data convergence guiding RCT refinements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has undergone external expert peer review and is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (grant number: NIHR302160). Ethical approval has been granted by South Central-Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee (IRAS number: 317291). Results will be disseminated through the lay media, social media, peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05591625.

Indexed as

Eye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingMental HealthCritical CareFeasibility StudiesHospitalsHumansPatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvivorsAnxiety disordersFeasibility StudiesINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREMENTAL HEALTHPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID38286705
PMCPMC10826543
OpenAlexW4391330458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.