Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286699›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol for a scoping review of how people with ME/CFS use the internet.

Diane Louise Shortland, Qulsom Fazil, Nutmeg Hallett, Anna Lavis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diane Louise ShortlandInstitute of Applied Health Research, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Campus, Spalding, UK DLS760@student.bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-710X
Qulsom FazilInstitute of Applied Health Research, School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nutmeg HallettSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3115-8831
Anna LavisInstitute of Applied Health Research, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMyalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is a chronic neurological illness affecting many bodily systems, commonly the nervous and immune systems. Also known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), key symptoms are extreme fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive problems and sleep disturbance. With reported higher levels of online activity for people with ME/CFS than other patient groups (Westerby 2013 cited in Ytre-Arne) it is crucial to gain more knowledge of usage characteristics and experience of online use, and its integration into everyday life. This scoping review protocol details the proposed methods for gaining insight into this little known phenomenon. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review uses the methodological framework for conducting a scoping review by Arksey and O'Malley, with further guidance by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings from this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and a report for leading charities of ME/CFS. The review will collect secondary data only and therefore does not need ethical approval.

Indexed as

Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicChronic DiseaseHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicChronic DiseaseFatigueGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)Protocols & guidelinesSocial Interaction

Identifiers

PMID38286699
PMCPMC10826554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.