Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38286691›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol for fever control using external cooling in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: SEPSISCOOL II randomised controlled trial.

Armelle Guénégou-Arnoux, Juliette Murris, Stéphane Bechet, Camille Jung, Johann Auchabie, Julien Dupeyrat, Nadia Anguel, Pierre Asfar, Julio Badie, Dorothée Carpentier and 25 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04494074 (Intérêt du Traitement de la fièvre Par Refroidissement Externe Pour la Survie Des Patients ventilés en Choc Septique), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04494074 narecruitingnot on this map

Intérêt du Traitement de la fièvre Par Refroidissement Externe Pour la Survie Des Patients ventilés en Choc Septique

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilRan2022 to 2026Enrolled820ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsExternal Cooling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Armelle Guénégou-ArnouxINSERM CIC1418-EC, INSERM-INRIA HeKA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France armelle.arnoux@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-7086
Juliette MurrisINSERM-INRIA HeKA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7017-9865
Stéphane BechetAssociation ACTIV, Créteil, France.
Camille JungCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Creteil, France.
Johann AuchabieCentre Hospitalier de Cholet, Cholet, France.
Julien DupeyratCentre Hospitalier de Cholet, Cholet, France.
Nadia AnguelICU Medical, AP-HP, Hôpital du Kremlin Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicètre, France.
Pierre AsfarCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Julio BadieHôpital Nord Franche-Comté - Site de Belfort, Belfort, France.
Dorothée CarpentierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France.
Benjamin ChoustermanHôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Jeremy BourenneMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Réanimation des Urgences, Aix-Marseille Université, CHU La Timone 2, Marseille, France.
Agathe DelboveRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France.
Jérôme DevaquetMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Nicolas DeyeRéanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, AP-HP, INSERM UMR-S 942, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France.
Guillaume DumasIntensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Albert Michallon, La Tronche, France.
Anne-Florence DureauGroupe Hospitalier Régional Mulhouse Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Stephane LegrielIntensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-6734
Christophe GuittonMédecine intensive réanimation, Centre Hospitalier de Mans, Le Mans, France.
Caroline Jannière-NarteyCentre Hospitalier de Libourne, Libourne, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotRéanimation médicale, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2351-682X
Jean-Claude LacheradeMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Departmental La Roche-sur-Yon, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Julien MaizelService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
Armand Mekontso DessapMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5961-5577
Bruno MourvillierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Reims, France.
Philippe PetuaCentre Hospitalier de Tarbes, Tarbes, France.
Gaetan PlantefeveService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-7368
Jean-Christophe RichardUniversité de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alexandre RobertPasteur 2 Medical ICU, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France.
Clément SaccheriMedical ICU, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Ly Van Phach VongGroupe Hospitalier Est Francilien, Jossigny, France.
Sandrine KatsahianINSERM CIC1418-EC, INSERM-INRIA HeKA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7261-0671
Frédérique SchortgenCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Creteil, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1756-7508
REVA Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFever treatment is commonly applied in patients with sepsis but its impact on survival remains undetermined. Patients with respiratory and haemodynamic failure are at the highest risk for not tolerating the metabolic cost of fever. However, fever can help to control infection. Treating fever with paracetamol has been shown to be less effective than cooling. In the SEPSISCOOL pilot study, active fever control by external cooling improved organ failure recovery and early survival. The main objective of this confirmatory trial is to assess whether fever control at normothermia can improve the evolution of organ failure and mortality at day 60 of febrile patients with septic shock. This study will compare two strategies within the first 48 hours of septic shock: treatment of fever with cooling or no treatment of fever. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SEPSISCOOL II is a pragmatic, investigator-initiated, adaptive, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, superiority trial in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with febrile septic shock. After stratification based on the acute respiratory distress syndrome status, patients will be randomised between two arms: (1) cooling and (2) no cooling. The primary endpoint is mortality at day 60 after randomisation. The secondary endpoints include the evolution of organ failure, early mortality and tolerance. The target sample size is 820 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is funded by the French health ministry and was approved by the ethics committee CPP Nord Ouest II (Amiens, France). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04494074.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticEquivalence Trials as TopicFeverHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, Artificialadult intensive & critical careclinical trialintensive & critical carestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID38286691
PMCPMC10826574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.